Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

THE IMPACT OF EVALUATION-BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ON THE PROFESSIONAL DEVIANT BEHAVIORS OF MEDICAL STAFF

Download as PDF

Volume 3, Issue 2, Pp 1-6, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wms3062

Author(s)

YuXuan Ru, GenQiang Li*

Affiliation(s)

School of Health Management, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453000, Henan, China.

Corresponding Author

GenQiang Li

ABSTRACT

Performance appraisal is divided into two types: developmental and evaluative. To enhance medical quality and efficiency, the healthcare service system widely adopts evaluative performance appraisal as a key management tool, primarily focusing on short-term goal achievement and closely linking compensation, promotions, and task indicators. On one hand, the "reward diligence and penalize laziness" mechanism can effectively motivate employees to improve performance output. On the other hand, if the appraisal system excessively pursues instrumentalism, this overemphasis on results and competition can translate into psychological pressure for employees, triggering work-related anxiety and even leading some to engage in professional misconduct to achieve targets. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in high-pressure environments like healthcare work. Currently, research on evaluative performance appraisal predominantly examines its direct relationship with job performance, while lacking in-depth exploration of the psychological transmission mechanisms behind professional misconduct and the moderating role of individual stress resilience. Based on this, this study selects the Conservation of Resources Theory as its theoretical foundation. From a stress-coping perspective, it treats workplace anxiety as a mediating variable and employee resilience as a moderating variable, systematically analyzing the impact pathway of evaluative performance appraisal on healthcare workers' professional misconduct. By leveraging workplace anxiety, the study reveals the intrinsic connection between evaluative performance appraisal and professional misconduct, while introducing employee resilience to explore how it moderates the relationships among evaluative performance appraisal, work-related anxiety, and professional misconduct.

KEYWORDS

Evaluation performance assessment; Professional misconduct; Workplace anxiety; Medical staff

CITE THIS PAPER

YuXuan Ru, GenQiang Li. The impact of evaluation-based performance appraisal on the professional deviant behaviors of medical staff. World Journal of Management Science. 2025, 3(2): 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wms3062.

REFERENCES

[1] Baxley E, Dunahue S, Koempel A, et al. Sexual Misconduct by Board Certified Family Physicians. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2024, 37(4): 698-705.

[2] Arnezeder, Christian. Wo Psychotherapie ihr Ziel verfehlen kann. Psychotherapeut, 2022, 67(4): 1-7.

[3] Okeke, Ehis S, Offor, et al. Internal Control: Its Role in the Reduction of Fraud and Professional Misconduct among SMEsAsian. Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 2021: 57-66.

[4] Dimmock S G, Gerken W C, Alfen T V. Real Estate Shocks and Financial Advisor Misconduct. The Journal of Finance, 2021, 76(6): 3309-3346.

[5] Sojung L L, Weiguo Z. Run away or stick together: the impact of firm misbehavior on alliance partners’ defection in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 2020, 26(5): 663-689.

[6] Lander W M, Oosterhout V J, Heugens P, et al. Career stage dependent effects of law firm governance: A multilevel study of professional-client misconduct. Human Relations, 2019, 72(9): 1497-1529.

[7] Rupal S, Alice D, Lydia H, et al. How accessible are you? A hospital-wide audit of the accessibility and professionalism of Facebook profiles. British dental journal, 2019, 226(11): 878-882.

[8] Li Genqiang, Yu Boxiang, Meng Yong. Developmental Human Resource Management Practices and Employees' Proactive Innovative Behavior: From the Perspective of Information Processing Theory. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(07): 163-170.

[9] Zhao Jun, Liao Jianqiao, Wen Peng. Dimensions and Influence Effects of Performance Appraisal Objectives. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2013(01): 144-151.

[10] Srini P, Patrick C, Erik C. Managing Workplace Anxiety during the Pandemic: A Pilot Study of Natural Imagery through 4K Video and Virtual Reality. European Journal of Marketing and Economics, 2022, 5(1): 16-37.

[11] Liang X, Li J. Sustainable human resource management and employee performance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 2025, 35(2): 101060-101060.

[12] Alzola M. The possibility of virtue Bus Ethics Q. 2012, 22(2): 377-404.

[13] Renée B, Amy F, Elena F. The New Academic Environment and Faculty Misconduct. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2016, 91(2): 175-9.

[14] Young S L, Wiley K K. Erased: Why faculty sexual misconduct is prevalent and how we could prevent it. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 2021, 27(3): 276-300.

[15] Sarah Y, Kimberly W. Erased: Ending faculty sexual misconduct in academia an open letter from women of public affairs education. Critical Policy Studies, 2021, 15(2): 131-136.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.