Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

CAN DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ENHANCE INFORMATION DISCLOSURE QUALITY?

Download as PDF

Volume 3, Issue 3, Pp 39-48, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjebr3053

Author(s)

XiangLe Shangguan1*, YuSha Wei2

Affiliation(s)

1School of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, Heilongjiang, China.

2Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang 11800, Malaysia.

Corresponding Author

XiangLe Shangguan

ABSTRACT

Amid the rapid development of the artificial intelligence era, digital technology has become deeply embedded in corporate development, and the implementation of digital transformation has emerged as a primary driver for the transformation and upgrading of the real economy. This paper examines a sample of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2021. By quantifying the degree of corporate digital transformation through text mining and constructing a moderated mediation model, this study analyzes the underlying mechanism linking digital transformation, internal control, and information disclosure quality. It further explores the moderating role of the marketization process. The findings indicate that corporate digital transformation significantly enhances information disclosure quality, with this effect being more pronounced in state-owned enterprises (SOEs), high-tech firms, and industries with high market concentration. The mechanism analysis reveals that internal control plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between digital transformation and information disclosure quality. Furthermore, the marketization process moderates both the direct effect and the mediation effect. A higher degree of marketization strengthens the positive impact of digital transformation on disclosure quality. This moderation of the mediation effect is primarily concentrated on the first stage of the path, amplifying the positive influence of digital transformation on internal control. These conclusions enrich the literature on the economic consequences of digital transformation and the determinants of information disclosure quality, and they hold significant practical implications for firms implementing digital transformation and innovating their business models.

KEYWORDS

Digital transformation; Internal control; Information disclosure quality; Marketization process; Moderated mediation effect

CITE THIS PAPER

XiangLe Shangguan, YuSha Wei. Can digital transformation enhance information disclosure quality?. World Journal of Economics and Business Research. 2025, 3(3): 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjebr3053.

REFERENCES

[1] Chen Chouyong, Xu Jinghan. Evaluation System and Application of Digital Transformation Capability of Manufacturing Enterprises. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(11): 46-51.

[2] Luo Jinhui, Wu Yilong. Digital Operation Level and Real Earnings Management. Management Science, 2021, 34(04): 3-18.

[3] Zhang Yanchao, Bu Jun. Will the digital transformation of enterprises affect the comparability of accounting information. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2023, 257(02): 41-51.

[4] Hou K, Robinson D T. Industry Concentration and Average Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(4): 1927-1956. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00893.x.

[5] Luo Jinhui, Wu Yilong. Digital Operation Level and Real Earnings Management. Management Science, 2021, 34(04): 3-18.

[6] Qin Rongsheng. Digital Transformation and Intelligent Accounting Construction. Finance and Accounting, 2021, 646(22): 4-6.

[7] Tian Gaoliang, Zhang Xiaotao. On Intelligent Finance Empowering Value Creation in the Digital Economy Era. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2022, 934(18): 18-24.

[8] Xu Yuandeng, Xu Chaoya, Zhong Tingyong. Aspiration-Performance Feedback and Corporate Accounting Information Disclosure: A Wish Come True or A Backfire?. Learning and Exploration, 2022, 328(11): 161-169.

[9] Du Jinzhu, Wu Zhanyong. Research on the Impact of Digital Economy on Corporate Information Disclosure Quality. Friends of Accounting, 2022, 692(20): 72-78.

[10] Yi Jingtao, Wang Yuehao. Research on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Enterprise Exports. China Soft Science, 2021(03): 94-104.

[11] Murry A, Kuban S, Josefy M, et al. Contracting in the Smart Era: The Implications of Blockchain and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations for Contracting and Corporate Governance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2021, 35(4): 622-641. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2018.0066.

[12] Nie Xingkai, Wang Wenhua, Pei Xuan. Will Corporate Digital Transformation Affect Accounting Information Comparability?. Accounting Research, 2022, 415(05): 17-39.

[13] Yuan Chun, Xiao Tusheng, Geng Chunxiao, et al. Digital Transformation and Firm Division of Labor: Specialization or Vertical Integration. China Industrial Economics, 2021, 402(09): 137-155. DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2021.09.007.

[14] Wu Xiaohui, Qin Libin, Bo Wen. Corporate Digital Transformation and Cash Holdings: Based on the Perspective of Operational Uncertainty. Economic Management, 2023, 45(02): 151-169.

[15] Mei Dan. An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Internal Control Quality and Accounting Information Comparability: Evidence from China's Listed Companies from 2011 to 2014. Review of Economy and Management, 2017, 33(05): 34-41.

[16] Dong Wang, Chen Hanwen. Internal Control, Accrual Quality and Earnings Response. Auditing Research, 2011(4): 68-78.

[17] Ye Jianfang, Li Danmeng, Zhang Binying. The Impact of Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Correction on Earnings Management. Auditing Research, 2012(6): 50-59+70.

[18] Zhang Yueling, Zhou Na. Internal Control, Audit Supervision and Accounting Information Disclosure Quality. Accounting and Communications, 2020, 845(09): 11-16.

[19] Gong Xingguo, Yu Yueli, Lin Chunlei. Strategic Aggressiveness, Marketization Process and Corporate Financing Constraints: Empirical Data from A-share Manufacturing Listed Companies. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 2022, 19(02): 50-59.

[20] Tang Song, Li Qing, Wu Fei. Financial Marketization Reform and Corporate Digital Transformation: Evidence from China's Interest Rate Marketization. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences), 2022, 37(01): 13-27.

[21] Wu Fei, Hu Huizhi, Lin Huiyan, et al. Corporate Digital Transformation and Capital Market Performance: Empirical Evidence from Stock Liquidity. Management World, 2021, 37(07): 130-144+10. DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0097.

[22] Fan Gang, Wang Xiaolu, Hu Lipeng. China's Marketization Index by Provinces Report (2018). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2019.

[23] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

[24] Wen Zhonglin, Zhang Lei, Hou Jietai, et al. Testing and Application of the Mediating Effects. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2004(05): 614-620.

[25] Wen Zhonglin, Ye Baojuan. Different Methods for Testing Moderated Mediation Models: Competitors or Backups? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46, 714-726. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00714.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.