Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.
Open Access

COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF 2D AND 3D MR IMAGES IN STAGING AND HISTOPATHOLOGY FINDINGS OF LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER

Download as PDF

Volume 5, Issue 1, Pp 8-14, 2022

Author(s)

Guo-Jie Wang1# , Le-Wei Yang2# , Shi-Rui Yang3# , Bin Zhou4 , Run-Gen Zhan5 , Ya-Li Zhang6, Yong-Jun Peng5*, Jie Zhang5*

Affiliation(s)

1.Department of Radiology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China

2.Department of Abdominal Oncology, The Cancer Center of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China

3.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhuhai People’s Hospital (Zhuhai hospital affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai 519000, China

4.Department of Pathology, Zhuhai People’s Hospital (Zhuhai hospital affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai 519000,

China

5.Department of Radiology, Zhuhai People’s Hospital (Zhuhai hospital affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai 519000, China

6.Xindian health center, SuiDe 718000, China

Corresponding Author

Yong-Jun Peng, Jie Zhang

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare three-dimensional (3D) volume measurement versus two-dimensional (2D) measurement during MR assessment of pre-treatment locally advanced cervical cancer, and to investigate the association of measurement outcomes with the staging of the tumor and histopathological feature in locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: 46 patients were found having locally advanced cervical cancer that was confirmed by pathology (39 squamous cell carcinoma,7 adenomatous carcinoma). All patients were scanned by conventional MR scan, DCE-MR, and DWI sequence. Measurement results were compared between normal tissues and cervical cancer tissues in 3D and 2D. The association of measurement outcomes of 3D and 2D with the pathological grade and clinical stage of cervical cancer was explored. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the results of 3D volume measurements and 2D diameter measurements (P>0.05). A significant correlation was found between the 3D volume measurement and cervical cancer stages (P<0.05). There was no correlation between 2D measurements and the clinical stage of cervical cancer (P>0.05). The outcomes between 3D volume measurement and 2D diameter measurement(The short cross-sectional diameter) among different histopathological grading of cervical cancer had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion:3D volume measurement is more effective compared with 2D diameter measurement in MR assessment of locally advanced cervical cancer. In locally advanced cervical cancer, 3D volume measuring correlates with pathological grading and clinical stage. It provides more accurate and comprehensive data on pre-treatment cervical cancer. Therefore, 3D volume measurement can be used in preoperative MR imaging to monitor response to therapy and improve radiomics features analysis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

KEYWORDS

 Cervical cancer, Locally advanced cancer, MR imaging, Tumor stage

CITE THIS PAPER

Guo-Jie Wang, Le-Wei Yang, Shi-Rui Yang, Bin Zhou, Run-Gen Zhan, Ya-Li Zhang, Yong-Jun Peng, Jie Zhang. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2d and 3d mr images in staging and histopathology findings of locally advanced cervical cancer. Acta Translational Medicine. 2022, 5(1): 8-14.

REFERENCES

1. Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, et al. Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 2019-01-01;17(1):64-84.

2. Patel-Lippmann K, Robbins JB, Barroilhet L, Anderson B, Sadowski EA, Boyum J. MR Imaging of Cervical Cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017 2017-08-01;25(3):635-49.

3. He B, Chen W, Liu L, Hou Z, Zhu H, Cheng H, et al. Prediction Models for Prognosis of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal. Front Public Health. 2021 2021-01-20;9:654454.

4. Jajodia A, Gupta A, Prosch H, Mayerhoefer M, Mitra S, Pasricha S, et al. Combination of Radiomics and Machine Learning with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Clinical Outcome Prognostication in Cervical Cancer. Tomography. 2021 2021-08-05;7(3):344-57.

5. Potter R, Tanderup K, Schmid MP, Jurgenliemk-Schulz I, Haie-Meder C, Fokdal LU, et al. MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 2021-04-01;22(4):538-47.

6. Matsuo K, Machida H, Mandelbaum RS, Konishi I, Mikami M. Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 2019-01-01;152(1):87-93.

7. Perdrizet J, D'Souza D, Skliarenko J, Ang M, Barbera L, Gutierrez E, et al. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Guided Brachytherapy Versus Two-Dimensional and Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 2020-07-01;107(3):512-21.

8. Li X, Wang L, Cui Z, Li Y, Liu P, Wang Y, et al. Online MR evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction uterus motions and bladder volume changes during cervical cancer external beam radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2021 2021-09-17;16(1):179.

9. Ren J, Li Y, Yang JJ, Zhao J, Xiang Y, Xia C, et al. MRI-based radiomics analysis improves preoperative diagnostic performance for the depth of stromal invasion in patients with early stage cervical cancer. 2022.

10. Zhang J, Wang Y, Cao D, Shen K. MRI-based three-dimensional reconstruction for staging cervical cancer and predicting high-risk patients. Ann Transl Med. 2021 2021-09-01;9(18):1398.

11. Kokabu T, Masui K, Tarumi Y, Noguchi N, Aoyama K, Kataoka H, et al. 3D-Image-Guided Multi-Catheter Interstitial Brachytherapy for Bulky and High-Risk Stage IIB-IVB Cervical Cancer. 2022.

12. Thomeer MG, Vandecaveye V, Braun L, Mayer F, Franckena-Schouten M, de Boer P, et al. Evaluation of T2-W MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for the early post-treatment local response assessment of patients treated conservatively for cervical cancer: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol. 2019 2019-01-01;29(1):309-18.

13. Fu S, Pan M, Zhang J, Zhang H, Tang Z, Li Y, et al. Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Future Extrahepatic Metastasis and Macrovascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 2021-01-20;8:1065-76.

14. Lai H, Fu S, Zhang J, Cao J, Feng Q, Lu L, et al. Prior Knowledge-Aware Fusion Network for Prediction of Macrovascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022 2022-04-18;PP.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. sitemap
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.   All Rights Reserved.