CONNECTING DIMINISHING FERTILITY RATES TO PHILOSOPHY, AND ITS REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pp 9-12, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3075
Author(s)
RuoNan Liu
Affiliation(s)
Keystone Academy, Beijing 101138, China.
Corresponding Author
RuoNan Liu
ABSTRACT
Decreasing fertility rates have been a growing concern in today’s society; factors are complex, including scarce resources and economic hardships. This essay evaluates the present generation’s moral obligation to others’ lives and argues that while existing individuals are entitled to protection under the social contract, future generations lack the reciprocal moral claims necessary for similar obligations. By analyzing the philosophical perspectives of Rousseau and others, the paper differentiates between the rights of living beings and the conceptual nature of future lives. It concludes that decisions regarding procreation are deeply influenced by practical considerations of scarcity, autonomy, and the socio-economic concerns, necessitating a reevaluation of ethical responsibilities. Ultimately, analysis underscores the importance of balancing support for existing lives while acknowledging the complexities surrounding future generations in an increasingly resource-constrained world.
KEYWORDS
Ethics; Obligation; Morality; Reproduction; Environment
CITE THIS PAPER
RuoNan Liu. Connecting diminishing fertility rates to philosophy, and its real-life implications. Social Science and Management. 2026, 3(1): 9-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/ssm3075.
REFERENCES
[1] Alvarez Pablo. How Much Has the Global Fertility Rate Decreased over the Years? World Economic Forum, 17 June 2022.
[2] Reuters. Birth Rate in South Korea, the World’s Lowest, Rises for First Time in 9 Years. NBC News, 2025. Accessed 24 June 2025.
[3] Cockerill Jess. Birth Rates Are Plummeting in Most Nations, and the World Isn’t Prepared. ScienceAlert, 2024.
[4] Rousseau Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. Translated by Maurice Cranston, Penguin Books, 2004.
[5] Bufacchi Vittorio. Two Concepts of Violence. Political Studies Review 3.2, 2005: 193-204.
[6] Soto C. Killing, wrongness, and equality. Philos Stud, 2013, 164: 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9866-y.
[7] Young Robert. What Is so Wrong with Killing People? Philosophy, 1979, 54(210): 515–528.
[8] Fred Feldman. Utilitarianism, Victimism, and the Morality of Killing, 1994.
[9] Woods Tyler. 11 Reasons People Choose Not to Have Children. Psychology Today, 2023.
[10] Kaczor Christopher. Philosophy Faculty Works Philosophy Philosophy and Theology: Reproductive Rights Philosophy and Theology. Reproductive Rights, 2013.
[11] Cheng Mira. Global Fertility Rates to Plunge in Decades Ahead, New Report Says. CNN, 2024.
[12] Stallworthy Ben. The Fight for Abortion Rights in the US. Population Matters, 2023.
[13] Weixel Nathaniel. Abortions Continued Rising in 2024 despite State Bans: Report. The Hill, 2025.
[14] Xiaomabufeihua. Why Don't Women Want to Have Children Now? A Look at the 40 Million Views Post on Zhihu. Baidu Baijiahao, 2020.
[15] Jiupai News. 5000 Douban Discussions Reveal Why Men and Women 'DINKs' Don't Want Children. Sohu News, 2023. http://news.sohu.com/a/641124036_121019331.
[16] American Pregnancy Association. Financial Help for Pregnant Women. American Pregnancy Association, 2022.
[17] Huaxia. Subsidies, Services, Social Shifts: China’s Strategic Push for a Birth-Friendly Future. News.cn, 2025.
[18] Kumar Nimish. UK Parliament Decriminalises Abortion Law for Women - the International Parliament Journal (IPJ). The International Parliament Journal (IPJ), 2025.
[19] The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China. Population and Family Planning Law of the People’s Republic of China. Npc.gov.cn, 2021.

Download as PDF