Author(s)

ZhiHao Zhu

Affiliation(s)

Kings' School Al Barsha, Dubai 38199, United Arab Emirates.

Corresponding Author

ZhiHao Zhu

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the perennial debate concerning the existence of God through an analysis of two classical theistic arguments—the Design Argument and the Cosmological Argument—and their contemporary scientific counterparts, namely the Big Bang theory and the theory of Evolution. While the former rely on metaphysical reasoning and inferential logic, the latter are grounded in empirical observation and theoretical modelling. Through a structured comparison, this paper assesses the epistemological foundations, explanatory scope, and philosophical implications of each approach. It concludes that while scientific theories offer robust and testable explanations for cosmic and biological origins, the theistic arguments retain persuasive force in addressing questions of ultimate causation and intentionality, highlighting the complementary rather than contradictory nature of these frameworks in certain philosophical contexts.

KEYWORDS

Existence of god; Design argument; Cosmological argument; Big Bang theory; Theory of evolution; Philosophy of religion; Science and religion

CITE THIS PAPER

ZhiHao Zhu. An examination of theistic and scientific cosmological arguments: a comparative. Journal of Religion, Ethics, and Philosophy. 2026, 3(1): 5-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/jrep3013.

REFERENCES

[1] Hubble E. A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra-Galactic Nebulae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1929, 15(3): 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.3.168.

[2] Paley W. Natural Theology: or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. London: R. Faulder, 1802.

[3] Aquinas T. Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). New York: Benziger Bros, 1947.

[4] Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1st ed.). London: John Murray, 1859.

[5] Dawkins R. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1986.

[6] Plantinga A. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

[7] Craig W L. The Kalam Cosmological Argument. London: Macmillan Press, 1979.

[8] Gould S J. Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York: Ballantine Books, 1999.